Skip to content

Pocketbase vs Supabase

Short answer

PocketBase is a free, open source backend that ships as a single executable file with an embedded SQLite database, meant to be self-hosted with no official managed cloud. Supabase gives every project a dedicated Postgres database plus auth, storage and APIs, available as a managed cloud service or self-hosted. Choose PocketBase for the simplest possible self-hosted setup on SQLite; choose Supabase for a managed cloud option and a full Postgres database that scales further.

Facts checked on against the official sources listed at the end. Usage numbers update daily.

Pocketbase

Best for

Small to mid-size self-hosted projects that want a single binary and SQLite

Free plan.

Supabase

Best for

Projects that want a managed cloud option and a full relational Postgres database

Free plan. Paid from $25 a month (Pro), plus usage above the included limits.

Pocketbase vs Supabase at a glance

Compared onPocketbaseSupabase
Database engineEmbedded SQLite, bundled into the single binaryDedicated Postgres database per project
Deployment modelSelf-hosted only, no official managed cloudManaged cloud (with a free tier) or self-hosted
SetupDownload and run a single executable file; no separate services to configureCreate a project through the dashboard or CLI, or run the open source stack yourself
Admin interfaceBuilt into the same single binary as an admin dashboardWeb-based Studio dashboard for the whole project
Extending the backendExtend with Go (compiled in) or JavaScript hooksEdge Functions (Deno-compatible) and Postgres functions
Scaling modelLimited by SQLite's single-writer model and whatever server you run it onManaged Postgres that can scale compute and storage on paid plans
Open sourceYes, MITYes, Apache-2.0
Free planYes, PocketBase is free and self-hosted; there is no paid managed versionYes: 2 active projects, 500 MB database, 50,000 monthly active users, 1 GB file storage. Projects pause after 1 week of inactivity.
Paid plans fromNot listed$25 a month (Pro), plus usage above the included limits
Made byPocketBase (open source project)Supabase Inc.
LaunchedNot listed2020

What's the difference between Pocketbase and Supabase?

1

PocketBase is one file, Supabase is a managed platform

PocketBase runs as a single Go binary with an embedded SQLite database and admin dashboard, so getting started means downloading and running one file. Supabase is a full platform with its own dashboard, either run as a managed cloud service or self-hosted as multiple coordinated services.

2

Supabase offers a managed cloud, PocketBase doesn't

Supabase has an official managed cloud with a free tier and paid plans, so you don't have to run your own servers. PocketBase has no official managed cloud offering; every deployment is self-hosted on your own infrastructure.

3

SQLite limits PocketBase's scale in ways Postgres doesn't for Supabase

PocketBase's embedded SQLite database is a single-writer system, which caps how much concurrent write traffic one instance can handle. Supabase's dedicated Postgres database supports much higher concurrency and can scale compute and storage independently on paid plans.

4

PocketBase extends with compiled Go, Supabase extends with Edge Functions

PocketBase is typically extended by writing Go code that gets compiled directly into your own binary, or by using its JavaScript hook system. Supabase is extended through Edge Functions running on a Deno-compatible runtime, deployed separately from the core database.

Pocketbase vs Supabase pricing

PocketBase itself is always free, since it's self-hosted software with no vendor pricing plan. Supabase has both a free managed tier and paid plans, plus the option to self-host for free like PocketBase.

Pocketbase

Free and open source under the MIT license. There's no official paid or managed version; costs come only from whatever server or hosting you run it on.

What each Pocketbase plan includes

Supabase

Free: 2 active projects, 500 MB database, pauses after 1 week idle. Pro: from $25 a month for 8 GB database and 100,000 monthly active users. Self-hosting the full stack is also free.

Free
$0
Pro
From $25 a month
Team
From $599 a month
Enterprise
Custom

What each Supabase plan includes

Prices in USD from the official pricing pages on 29 September 2026. They change often, so confirm on pocketbase.io and supabase.com before you commit.

Usage and activity

Supabase has 81% more GitHub stars than Pocketbase (111k against 61.3k). Weekly npm downloads: 286k for pocketbase and 35M for @supabase/supabase-js. Releases on GitHub in the last 90 days: 5 for Pocketbase and 1 for Supabase.

MeasurePocketbaseSupabase
GitHub stars61,305111,180
npm downloads a week286k (pocketbase)35M (@supabase/supabase-js)
Latest releasev0.40.4, 3 weeks agov1.26.08, 2 months ago
Releases in 90 days51

From the public GitHub and npm APIs, updated daily. Stars and downloads show developer interest, not product quality.

Should you choose Pocketbase or Supabase?

Choose Pocketbase if

  • You want the simplest possible self-hosted setup: one binary, no separate services
  • Your project's scale fits comfortably within SQLite's single-writer model
  • You want to extend the backend with compiled Go code rather than a separate functions runtime
  • You don't need a managed cloud option and are comfortable running your own server

Choose Supabase if

  • You want a managed cloud option so you don't have to run your own servers
  • You expect enough concurrent write traffic that SQLite's single-writer model would be a bottleneck
  • You want a real Postgres database with SQL and existing Postgres tooling
  • You want built-in row level security policies written in SQL

Switching between Pocketbase and Supabase

Moving from PocketBase to Supabase means migrating data out of SQLite into a Postgres schema and rebuilding any Go or JavaScript hooks as Edge Functions or Postgres functions. Moving from Supabase to PocketBase means the reverse: converting relational Postgres tables and row level security policies into PocketBase's collection model and its own permission rules, and giving up managed cloud hosting if you were using it.

Pocketbase vs Supabase: common questions

Does PocketBase have a managed cloud like Supabase?

No, PocketBase has no official managed cloud offering; it's self-hosted only. Supabase offers both a managed cloud with a free tier and the option to self-host.

Is PocketBase free?

Yes, entirely free and open source under the MIT license, with no paid tier since there's no vendor-run service. Supabase is also free to self-host, plus has a free managed cloud tier.

What database does PocketBase use?

An embedded SQLite database, bundled directly into its single executable file. Supabase gives every project a dedicated Postgres database instead.

Can PocketBase handle production-scale traffic?

It depends on your write concurrency, since SQLite is a single-writer database. Supabase's Postgres database generally supports higher concurrent write traffic, especially on paid plans with more compute.

How do you extend PocketBase's backend logic?

By writing Go code that compiles directly into your own PocketBase binary, or using its JavaScript hook system. Supabase extends through Edge Functions running on a separate Deno-compatible runtime.

Other options to consider

All databases tools

Redis

In-memory data store used as a cache, database and message broker, available self-hosted or as Redis Cloud.

Supabase vs Redis

MongoDB Atlas

MongoDB's fully managed cloud database service, with a free tier and usage-based paid tiers.

Supabase vs MongoDB Atlas

Firebase

Google's backend-as-a-service platform for mobile and web apps: database, auth, hosting and functions.

Supabase vs Firebase

Neon

Serverless Postgres platform with autoscaling and instant branching, owned by Databricks.

Neon vs Supabase

Sources

More sources for each tool are on the Pocketbase and Supabase pages.

PocketBase vs Supabase (2026): binary or cloud | ScratchDB