Skip to content

Tabnine alternatives

13 tools you can use instead of Tabnine, ranked by live GitHub stars and npm downloads. Claude Code, Open Interpreter and GPT Engineer are the most used. Stats updated 5 hours ago.

Short answer

Supermaven is the closest alternative for code completion, with a free tier and a Pro plan at $10 a month. GitHub Copilot adds chat and coding agents on top of completion, and JetBrains AI is built into JetBrains IDEs.

When Tabnine is not a good fit

Tabnine is an AI coding assistant known for private, enterprise-focused code completion and chat. In 2026, Tricentis acquired Tabnine to integrate its Enterprise Context Engine into Tricentis's agentic quality engineering platform for AI-driven software testing, alongside its existing developer coding assistant product.

It is a weaker choice for:

  • Developers wanting certainty about long-term product continuity, given the recent acquisition and shift in focus toward enterprise testing agents
  • Anyone needing current, detailed pricing without contacting Tabnine or Tricentis directly
Tabnine pricing, features and usage

The alternatives

Most used first.

1

Claude Code

Anthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, included with Claude Pro and Max subscriptions.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $20 a month (Claude Pro, monthly) or $17 a month billed annuallyOpen source noStars 150knpm a week 15M
View Claude Code
3

GPT Engineer

Early open source tool for generating an entire codebase from a natural-language prompt.

Pricing Open sourceOpen source yesStars 55.1k
View GPT Engineer
4

Aider

Open source AI pair programming tool that runs in the terminal and edits your codebase with git commits.

Pricing Open sourceOpen source yesStars 49.4k
View Aider
5

smol-developer

Early open source, single-file AI agent for scaffolding a small application from a prompt.

Pricing Open sourceOpen source yesStars 12.2k
View smol-developer
6

Amazon Q Developer

AWS's AI coding and cloud assistant, successor to Amazon CodeWhisperer, with a free and $19 a month Pro tier.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $19 per user a month (Pro tier)Open source no
View Amazon Q Developer
7

Cody

Sourcegraph's AI coding assistant, built on large-scale code search across an entire codebase.

Pricing PaidPaid from $16,000 minimum annual contract (Enterprise)Open source no
View Cody
8

Cursor

AI-powered code editor built on VS Code, made by Anysphere.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $20 a month for IndividualOpen source no
View Cursor
9

Cursor 3

AI-first code editor with agentic coding features, plans from free Hobby to $40 a user a month for Teams.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $20 a month (Individual plan)Open source no
View Cursor 3
10

GitHub Copilot

GitHub's AI pair programmer, with code completions, chat and coding agents in the editor.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $10 a month for Copilot ProOpen source no
View GitHub Copilot
11

Google Antigravity

Google's agentic development platform for building with AI agents, free for individual developers.

Pricing FreePaid from Contact Google for Enterprise pricingOpen source no
View Google Antigravity
12

JetBrains AI

AI coding assistant built into JetBrains IDEs, priced through a monthly AI Credit system.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $10 a month (AI Pro, 10 AI Credits per 30 days)Open source no
View JetBrains AI
13

Supermaven

Fast AI code completion tool with a large context window, owned by Cursor's maker Anysphere.

Pricing FreemiumPaid from $10 a month for the Pro planOpen source no
View Supermaven

Tabnine and its alternatives, side by side

ToolPricingFree planPaid fromOpen sourceGitHub stars
TabnineFreemiumHistorically yes, with a free tier for individual developers; confirm current availability on Tabnine's siteContact Tabnine or Tricentis for current pricingNoNone
Claude CodeFreemiumNo standalone free tier; included with paid Claude Pro and Max subscriptions$20 a month (Claude Pro, monthly) or $17 a month billed annuallyNo150k
Open InterpreterOpen sourceYes, fully free and open sourceNot listedYes, AGPL-3.068.5k
GPT EngineerOpen sourceYes, fully free and open sourceNot listedYes, MIT55.1k
AiderOpen sourceYes, Aider itself is free; you pay your chosen LLM provider directly for API usageNot listedYes, Apache-2.049.4k
smol-developerOpen sourceYes, fully free and open sourceNot listedYes, MIT12.2k
Amazon Q DeveloperFreemiumYes: 50 agentic requests a month and 1,000 lines of code transformation a month$19 per user a month (Pro tier)NoNone
CodyPaidA free trial is available; contact Sourcegraph for current details$16,000 minimum annual contract (Enterprise)NoNone
CursorFreemiumYes (Hobby): limited agent requests and access to Composer, no credit card required$20 a month for IndividualNoNone
Cursor 3FreemiumYes: Hobby plan with limited agent requests and access to Composer, no credit card required$20 a month (Individual plan)NoNone
GitHub CopilotFreemiumYes: 2,000 code completions and 50 chat requests a month, no AI credits included$10 a month for Copilot ProNoNone
Google AntigravityFreeYes, available at no charge for individual developersContact Google for Enterprise pricingNoNone
JetBrains AIFreemiumYes: AI Free tier includes 3 AI Credits per 30 days, no top-ups$10 a month (AI Pro, 10 AI Credits per 30 days)NoNone
SupermavenFreemiumYes: fast code suggestions, large codebase support, 7-day data retention$10 a month for the Pro planNoNone

Pricing facts come from each tool's official pricing page, with the checked date on the tool's own page.

Questions

What is the most popular alternative to Tabnine?

By GitHub stars, Claude Code is the most used alternative to Tabnine listed on ScratchDB, with 150k stars.

Which Tabnine alternatives are open source?

Open Interpreter, GPT Engineer, Aider and smol-developer are open source.

Which Tabnine alternatives have a free plan?

Open Interpreter, GPT Engineer, Aider, smol-developer, Amazon Q Developer, Cursor, Cursor 3, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, JetBrains AI and Supermaven have a free plan. The table on this page shows what each one includes.

All AI Coding Tools tools

Tabnine alternatives: 13 options compared (2026) | ScratchDB